1+-+F13+POLS+451+Privacy

=Privacy=

United States //v//. Antoine Jones (2012) The Supreme Court held that installing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment [|Opinion] Brief of //AMICI CURIAE// Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and Legal Scholars and Technical Experts in Support of the Respondent [|Brief of //AMICI// //CURIAE//]

__**News Articles**__ Christina DesMarais Oct 8, 2012 http://www.pcworld.com/article/2011352/texas-school-uses-rfid-badges-to-track-student-locations.html
 * Texas school uses RFID badges to track student locations

Students and privacy groups argues that Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) tracking in schools tracks not only an individual’s location, but it can monitor which people congregate together. Privacy groups have issued a position paper that argues RFID technology violates students’ rights to free speech and association. http://www.spychips.com/school/RFIDSchoolPositionPaper.pdf

Val Van Brocklin 8/21/2013 []
 * A brief review of 14 court cases on cell phone search incident to arrest

Click on interactive maps to view: 1) States where your cell phone can be searched when one is arrested 2) States where police need to get a warrant to check cell phone 3) States with no precedent set

By [|SOMINI SENGUPTA] New York Times Published: October 13, 2013 []
 * Privacy Fears Grow as Cities Increase Surveillance

By Warren Richey, Staff writer / April 15, 2013 [|http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2013/0415/Supreme-Court-refuses-e-mail-privacy-case-leaving-divergent-opinions-intact?cmpid=addthis_email#.UlR73n2ww3k.email]
 * Supreme Court refuses e-mail privacy case, leaving divergent opinions intact

[]
 * ACLU report on license plate readers

[]
 * ACLU report on automatic license plate reader retention periods around the country

Actress (11/17/2013)

Essential Cases:

Olmstead V. U.S.: relates to the constitutionality of wire tapping [|Opinion] [|Brief]

Katz V. U.S.: overturned olmstead specifically the "trespass" doctorine [|Opinion] [|Brief]

Griswold V. Conneticut: first clear articulation of a right to privacy [|Opinion] [|Brief]

Kyllo v U.S.: relates to the use of high tech surveillance [|Opinion] [|Brief]

these 4 seem essential. there may be more and I'm continuing to research just wanted to get these 4 into circulation so we could all have an idea where were starting from.

__FISA Court: A Brief History__ []

__FISC Judges: Who does the Chief Justice pick? (modern day court-packing)__ []

__The FISA Court: Rubber Stamp for Executive Warrants? (the stats say "yes") __ []

__FISC in Action: the Infamous Snowden Leak __

Original Guardian Article: [] Original FISA Memo: []

__FISC and other (Circuit) Courts:Corroborating Privacy Infringement__

District Court case ruling Patriot Act with FISA Amendments Unconstitutional (Mayfield v United States 2007): [] Appeals Court case vacating 2007 decision two years later (FISA Amendments Constitutional) []